学校毕业论文要求翻译两篇英语外文文献，可是至今为止只解决了一篇，我写的内容是关于离婚损害赔偿，有没有哪位好心人，能帮我提供中英文对照的文章，译成中文大概四千字左右，谢谢了~~不甚感激啊~~

离婚损害赔偿概述
　　离婚损害赔偿，是指夫妻一方有过错致使婚姻家庭关系破裂，离婚时对无过错的一方所受的损失，有过错的一方应承担的民事赔偿责任。修正后的婚姻法增设了离婚时的损害赔偿制度，因一方的法定过错导致离婚的，无过错的，另一方依法享有赔偿请求权，婚姻法第46条规定，有下列情形之一，导致离婚的，无过错方有权请求损害赔偿。第一，征婚的，第二，有配偶者与他人同居的，第三，实施家庭暴力的，第四，虐待遗弃家庭成员的
[编辑本段]离婚损害赔偿的构成要件
　　离婚损害赔偿责任是属于民事损害赔偿的一种，离婚损害赔偿民事责任的构成要件中的违法行为应为过错行为。因此根据《中华人民共和国婚姻法》以下简称《婚姻法》第四十六条和《最高人民法院关于适用<中华人民共和国婚姻法>若干问题的解释（一）》以下简称《解释》第二十九条的规定，离婚损害赔偿责任的构成应满足以下条件：
　　1、侵权行为的发生。夫妻一方实施了法定的违法行为，即重婚；有配偶者与他人同居；实施家庭暴力；虐待、遗弃家庭成员四种侵权行为。笔者认为，以上四种情形过于狭窄。应将赌博、吸毒作为离婚损害赔偿的情形。
　　2、行为人存有过错。行为人只要具有《婚姻法》第四十六条规定的情形之一的，不论行为人是故意的或者是过失的，即应当认定行为人有过错。作为离婚损害赔偿责任的构成要件，还要求被侵权的夫妻一方须无过错。无过错方的过错是指不存在婚姻法第四十六条规定的四种情形之一，不是指没有任何过错。
　　3、违法行为与损害事实之间具有因果关系。损害事实是构成损害赔偿责任的要件之一。该违法行为给无过错方造成了财产和人身、精神上的损害事实。没有物质、人身或精神损害，也就失去了赔偿的前提。财产损害是指财产利益的损失。财产损失可分为直接损失和间接损失。精神损害是指公民人格权的侵犯而在人的精神上产生的损害后果。
　　4、违法行为导致了夫妻间的离婚。该违法行为与感情破裂具有因果关系，即该违法行为是导致婚姻破裂的主要原因。如果不具备该要件，夫妻之间没有被判离婚，也就不存在离婚损害赔偿问题。
[编辑本段]离婚损害赔偿请求权的行使
　　1、请求权人的主体资格。离婚损害赔偿请求权人必须是无过错一方。离婚损害赔偿请求权只能由无过错一方向有过错一方提出，而不能向其他人提出赔偿请求，婚姻法第四十六条中所指的无过错方，只能是离婚夫妻的无过错方。对因不合法婚姻如重婚导致的无效婚姻以及有配偶者与他人同居（不论采用什么手段）中存在的无过错方，不享有该项请求权，因为这种无过错方不是适格的主体。
　　2、被请求权的主体资格。该项损害请求只能向自己的配偶提出，而不能向合法婚姻以外的其他人提起。《解释》第二十九条第一款就承担损害赔偿责任的主体资格作出明确规定，即“承担婚姻法第四十六条规定的损害赔偿责任的主体，为离婚诉讼当事人中无过错方的配偶。”该条所指的配偶中有过错的一方，与无过错一方互为配偶。对有的当事人在请求时要求配偶以外的第三者等进行赔偿的，这是没有法律依据的，法院也不能支持。
　　3、请求权的行使必须以当事人有过错并因此导致离婚的为前提。
　　此项损害赔偿请求权的行使，须有符合法律规定的过错情形并因此导致离婚的，也就是说，只有一方在违反婚姻法第三条第二款的禁止性规定导致离婚的，才可以行使此项权利。笔者认为，此要求过于严格，不利于具体操作。对于一方过错的范围应当扩大一些。如将吸毒、赌博包括在内，才能真正发挥婚姻法第四十六条保护无过错一方的作用。对于不起诉离婚而又依该条提出损害赔偿请求的，法院不予受理。对于法院判决不准离婚的，对于当事人基于婚姻法第四十六条提出的损害赔偿请求，不予支持。



An overview of divorce damages
Divorce damages, is the fault of one of the spouses has led to the breakdown of marriage and family relations, no-fault divorce on the party suffered losses, there is the fault of the party should bear civil liability. Marriage amendment added at the time of divorce damages the system, due to the fault of either the statutory cause for divorce, no fault, the other party legally entitled to claim the right under article 46 of the Marriage Law, has one of the following situations cause a divorce, the innocent party the right to request damages. First, marriage, and the second, who has a spouse living with others, third, the implementation of domestic violence, the fourth, abuse of family members abandoned
[Edit this paragraph] divorce damages Tatbestand
Liability for damage of divorce is a civil damages, divorce civil liability for damages constitute the elements of the offense should act as a fault. Therefore, according to "Marriage Law of the PRC," hereinafter referred to as "Marriage" and 46th "The Supreme People's Court on the application of <People's Republic of China Marriage Law> a number of questions the interpretation of (1)" hereinafter referred to "explain" the provisions of Article twenty-ninth, divorce damages the composition should meet the following conditions:
1, the occurrence of violations. One spouse has a statutory offense, that is, bigamy; have spouse cohabitation with others; the implementation of domestic violence; abuse, abandonment of family members of four violations. The author believes that the above four cases is too narrow. Should be gambling, drug abuse, as the case of divorce damages.
2, there is the fault of the perpetrator. Behavior as long as people have a "Marriage" article 46th of the situation, whether people are intentional acts or negligence, that is, acts that people should have the fault. Liability for damages as a divorce, the composition of the Elements, but also asked to be infringing one of the spouses have to no-fault. The fault of the innocent party is the 46th non-existent Marriage provides one of the four cases, did not mean there is no fault.
3, violations and the damage has a causal relationship between the truth. The fact is that the damage constitutes a liability for damage to one of the elements. The offense caused to the innocent party of property and personal, spiritual truth damage. There was no material, physical or mental harm, it is a prerequisite for loss of compensation. Property damage refers to loss of property interests. Property losses can be divided into direct losses and indirect losses. Moral damage refers to citizens of violations of the right personality and the people at the mental damage arising from the consequences.
4, an offense led to a divorce between husband and wife. The offense and the feelings of a causal relationship has broken, that is, the violations are the main reason for the breakdown of the marriage cause. If you do not possess the elements, between husband and wife have not been convicted of divorce, divorce does not exist the question of damages.
[Edit this paragraph] divorce damages the right to exercise
1, the right to request the main body of qualified people. Divorce damages people claim to be a party are not at fault. Divorce damages claim can only be made by no-fault direction there is the fault of one party, but to other people should not claim for compensation, the Marriage Law of the meaning of Article 46th innocent party can only be divorced husband and wife are the innocent party. Of legal marriage because they do not cause the invalidity of such as bigamy and marriage who has a spouse living together with others (whatever means) that exist in the innocent party, does not enjoy the right of the request, which the innocent party is not appropriate for the main grid.
2, the requested right of the main qualifications. The damage to the request only to their own spouse, but not legally married to other people brought. "Explain" the first paragraph of Article twenty-ninth to assume liability for damage on the main body of the qualifications to make specific provisions, namely, "to assume the Marriage Law of the 46th Article of the main liability for damages, for litigants in the no-fault divorce to the spouse." referred to in the article there is the fault of the spouse of a party no-fault party and their spouses to each other. For some at the request of the parties request a third party other than the spouse, such as compensation, there is no legal basis, the court can not support.
3, the request must be based on the exercise of the right to have the fault of the parties and therefore the premise of the cause of divorce.
This damages the right to exercise, in conformity with the law have to have the fault of the case and therefore cause for divorce, that is, only one party in violation of Article III of the Marriage Law prohibitions cause for divorce before they can exercise this rights. The author believes that this requirement is too strict, is not conducive to concrete operation. For the party at fault should be extended some. Such as drug, gambling included, can really exert Marriage Protection 46th the role of non-fault side. For divorce and not to prosecute in accordance with which the request for damages, the court inadmissible. For court decisions are not allowed to divorce for the parties based on the Marriage Law of the 46th Article of the request for damages, not to support it.