I think that ran deep. Assistance to poor countries to rich and poor countries is beneficial to both sides.

Rich countries because of their religious beliefs and humanitarian spirit, should be aid to impoverished countries. Poor countries do not have sufficient basis for the development of the national economy from the line, they do not even have enough food and medicine, hundreds of millions of people a year die from hunger and disease. We can not sit idly by and watch these innocent people died.

Would like to become a true sense of power, it is necessary to fulfil the responsibility of a big country, to help countries in need of help, to give them to survive. This is also the reputation of rich countries have a positive effect.

For poor countries, they also need assistance. They can not only to their own ability to reverse the impoverished state. They need external resources to help them survive and getting rid of the status quo. They need enough food to survive, needs funds to develop the economy, only accept assistance that they have a chance to shake off poverty and achieve development.

However, rich countries should pay attention to the ways and means of assistance, poor countries should also receive assistance in the efforts to achieve self-reliance at the same time. Poor countries need more than food and clothing, they need the opportunity of development, rich countries need to help poor countries develop the economy, give them the same trade opportunities and to provide them with advanced technology so as to ultimately enable them to escape poverty. While the poor countries in substantial financial assistance, should also pay attention to technological and economic development

貌似翻译得很好。。。看不出是否为软件翻译。。。