关于司法鉴定的证明力
我国刑事、民事、行政诉讼法都明确规定了证据的七种形式。证据是客观存在的事实，不论其以何种形式存在和表现，只要是客观事实，都能够证明案件的真实情况。证据本身的证明力与其自身存在的形式无关。从鉴定结论与其他证据的关系看，经合法程序形成的鉴定结论与其他形式的证据一样具有同等的法律效力，都必须经过查证属实才能作为定案的根据，并不具有优先采信或必须采信的证据地位。以鉴定结论形式出现的证据，有时能够证明其他证据形式不易或不能证实的案件事实，但不能因此认为鉴定结论的证明力高于其他证据形式。尽管鉴定结论是依据科学作出的结论，也只能证明案件的部分事实，不能证明案件的全部事实，更不能以一个鉴定结论代替所有证据。

On judicial proof of identification
China's criminal, civil and administrative procedure law explicitly provides for the seven forms of evidence. There is objective evidence of the fact that, regardless of what form and performance, as long as they are objective facts, are able to prove the truth of the case. That in itself evidence of the existence of their own in the form of irrelevant. Other conclusions from the evidence of the relationship, formed by the legal procedures and conclusions, like other forms of evidence has the same legal effect, we must be true after checking the basis for a decision, not a priority or believe to be credible evidence of status. The conclusions form the evidence can sometimes prove difficult to form or other evidence to confirm the facts of the case, but could not be considered proof of identification conclusions than other forms of evidence. Although conclusions are based on the conclusions of science, we can only prove the facts of the case, not all the facts prove the case, not to a conclusion instead of all the evidence.