问题: 这句话该怎么理解啊!
Trademark protection can be difficult especially if you aggressively defend everything.A wimpy approach is not necessary but it can be easy to assume a violation that is too minor to be defend.我怎么觉得这两句话是相互矛盾的呀!
解答:
商标权保护可以是一件困难的事情,特别是当你想做到滴水不漏的时候。
并不是说采用不严谨的保护手段就一定会引起无法防范的轻度侵权,但是比较容易导致这个结果。
[补充]
第二句话可能会因为读不懂句子结构而误解:
A wimpy approach is “not necessary but it can be easy” to assume a violation that is too minor to be defend.
其中“not necessary but it can be easy”要放在一起来看,都是定义后面“assume”的。把句子拆开的话,可以是这样的:
A wimpy approach is not necessary to assume a violation that is too minor to be defend, but it can be easy to assume so.
版权及免责声明
1、欢迎转载本网原创文章,转载敬请注明出处:侨谊留学(www.goesnet.org);
2、本网转载媒体稿件旨在传播更多有益信息,并不代表同意该观点,本网不承担稿件侵权行为的连带责任;
3、在本网博客/论坛发表言论者,文责自负。